I see the lawyer of the future - and (s)he’s carrying an eBook Reader
Books, Law, Legal Publishing February 25th, 2009Nick Holmes over at Binary Law has an interesting piece of the impending doom that is print media - or at least traditional ‘hard copy’ print as we know it today.
In particular, he raises the question of the future of the future of legal publications such as Law journals (particularly the more scholarly ones) and asks if the move away from traditional hard copy print runs has them set for an early grave - at least in that format.
Now, I love print - there, I have said it. Yes, in some ways I am a ‘web geek’ and I love new technologies - I think I’d be lost without my iPhone (or similar) - but, in part, the love of the feel of books - their physicality, their smell, their magic is what drove me into the profession I choose for myself.
That said, Nick’s article got my brain thinking in a different way, and less focussed on the death of print and more about its rebirth in a legal context. I believe that the ‘end of print’ is a long way away, if it indeed ever happens; but the opportunities for exploiting a move into electronic delivery are still in their infancy, and if I was a legal publisher, then I would be seeing a big light at the end of the tunnel. Why?
The eBook Reader:
Yes, Amazon’s Kindle, Iliad, Sony PRS-505 and the rest. I think the scope for the success of eBook Readers within the law is vast. It is a technology that - it seems to me - is just made for the legal environment.
On a personal user level, whilst being impressed with Sony’s eBook Reader, for example, and loving how it works, I can never image wanting to carry around several hundred/thousand books around with me. A handful, yes, but not my entire library, and not certainly not in the same way that I’d want to carry a similar amount of music albums or films.
However, if I were a lawyer, who could have all the legal journals I wanted and all the legal texts I wanted - displayed as they would be in a ‘traditional’ print run - all on one device that I could keep in my desk or take with me to client meetings etc, then I would be a very happy bunny. Yes, some of these legal texts are already available electronically on Westlaw and Lexis, but they do not LOOK like books, they don’t let you engage with them as books, and as a result will never replace the book/loose-leaf. Keep them as a ‘book’ and THEN digitise them, keeping what makes books work and useable - good indexes etc - whilst adding the functionality of the modern technological world - search, highlight and note taking (post it note functionality) etc - and I think you would have gold.
Of course, the main legal publishers will probably follow the usual route of making their own devices with incompatible file formats so that you’ll always need more than one reader in the same way that Apple and Co did with digital music and Amazon and Sony etc are already doing with eReaders.
Do you think I am right? Is the eBook the future for legal publishing? Is legal (and most likley educational publishing in general) the one thing that could turn eBooks and eBook readers into serious business? Let me know.
February 25th, 2009 at
Scott thanks for this…I’ve also just put a comment on Nick’s post. Your question “Is the eBook the future for legal publishing? Is legal (and most likley educational publishing in general) the one thing that could turn eBooks and eBook readers into serious business?”
My best answer to this is maybe, we haven’t yet seen any legal publishers consider this as a serious venture although as you say many Legal Books are available online although in a format that isn’t very nice looking or very intuitive for the end user.
I think the first step will be for a Legal Publisher to make the leap from doing this to doing something like Amazon inside and the functionality associated with this. Part of me also wonders why if they can make PDF’s of journals available in full online they cant spend some time doing the same for books?
One of the major issues which has been discussed on Nick’s blog is around updating - how do you see this work for a book which is published but is then updated via a supplement, some sort of free/charged for download maybe?
February 25th, 2009 at
I think eventually this will happen, it makes perfect sense from a lawyers perspective as you say. All the documents and texts on one device.
From a technical point of view I don’t think anything will happen until the reader becomes ubiquitous like say an iPod. Although I think this is getting nearer, I’ve not been interested in Kindle 1 or Sony’s offerings in the slightest, but even I would consider looking at a UK version of the Kindle 2!
February 25th, 2009 at
James, I don’t see why books published with update supplements would be a problem (or at least no more so than now). Charged / free download would be the way to go, and the pay/free issue would - like now - depend on if the original purchase covered any update(s)in cost/sub.
Likewise, if dealing with eLoose-leafs then dropping new pages in and republishing file to download etc for those who had ‘live’ subscription to updates would also be fairly straight forward.
February 25th, 2009 at
Hey scott
I too was interested by nick’s blog and also got me thinking about the use of books at law firms. My favourite time during my law degree was being surrounded by law books researching a number of different points, pulling it all together to respond to the ‘Discuss.’ essay question.
And That’s what making Books Online so difficult. The online interaction experience, whether with an e-book or with one of the multitude of legal publishing services is just fundamentally different. As you say above, it’s the flipping of pages, it’s the quick index-scanning of a pile of books that makes the death of books for some lawyers difficult to imagine.
I do agree that, for some, being able to carry around one big practice handbook would be heaven. Which brings to mind a certain brilliant employment barrister who jumps on his bike with his heavily annotated harvey’s strapped to the back whistling his way to the ET. For other practice areas however, this is just not possible.
So, death to books? For some parts of a law firm yes; but for others? Not until we’ve mastered lawyer needs from HCI and we’ve adapted to make it an enjoyable and effective experience.
Anyhoo, my tuppeny’s worth.
(Apologies for spelling etc errors - am typing on little keys!)
Thanks for the thinking-nuggets scott!
February 25th, 2009 at
Jason, I’m not sure eReader ubiquity is necessarily important in this sphere - at least not to the extent that it needs to be in the mainstream book market. If a Legal publisher gave a selection of lawyers eReaders loaded with Chitty or Harveys plus assorted others etc and let them use it, take it too meetings etc, then I think the blackberry effect would potentially generate the demand for the technology and the content. It also might fail horribly of course!
Kate (thanks for commenting by the way!) I agree with your point about lawyers and HCI, and I don’t think traditional print is going anywhere soon - hurrah! - even (or should that be ESPECIALLY!) within lawfirms. However, if was a legal publisher I would be seeing (or certainly already exploring) the potential benefits of this delivery format for their long term business plans.
We are a captive industry as far as a lot of legal content/commentary is concerned so they could take the opportunity to drag the legal profession, kicking and screaming, into the new world! LOL
February 25th, 2009 at
I had a wee muse on this topic about a year ago (http://jennielaw.blogspot.com/2008/02/kindle-in-commercial-settings.html), mainly coming up with doom and gloom…but I *do* like the idea of having an ereader for the fee-earners…mainly so I can nick it!
February 25th, 2009 at
There’s a thought - the White/Green/Brown Kindle plus support! At lawpub prices the publishers could afford to give away the digi kit when selling the digi product to newbies to establish the market. But I have this feeling of déjà vu.
February 27th, 2009 at
Scott, great insights — I’ve pursued them in a blog post at http://www.law21.ca/2009/02/27/the-future-law-book/.
March 3rd, 2009 at
[…] law bookEn garde! Magistrates ready for battle over punishmentsBack to the future of law reviews?I see the lawyer of the future - and (s)he’s carrying an eBook ReaderBook Review: The End of Lawyers?Insite Law Newswire: 8th February 2009LawCamp Leeds: 7 April 2009The […]
March 16th, 2009 at
[…] law journals. Information Overload, a UK Legal Librarian at Magic Circle firm Clifford Chance, also predicts the end of paper texts thanks to Kindle-like […]
April 1st, 2009 at
http://www.geeklawblog.com/2009/04/all-lawyers-and-paralegals-to-get.html
April 16th, 2009 at
Nick left me a message on my blog post over at the Gazette (yes we are now finally doing that) on e-readers (http://tinyurl.com/cbdmc3) saying “You’re asking for a technology-led solution. It’s nice to dream but that’s just not going to fly” — which is only kind of the case — but this is a technological ‘issue’… you can’t have e-books without it.
I wouldn’t argue for the death of print - TV didn’t kill radio, and it certainly didn’t kill cinema; not even VCRs or DVDs have achieved that - but I’d say certain kinds of publishing more readily lend themselves to e-book delivery, and legal books with their constant updates definitely do. Just factor in the number of barristers/lawyers/trainees/students who buy second-hand/old books instead of the new ones because they can’t afford them. And who’s making money from royalties on second-hand books? It ain’t the publishers, or the authors.
Paper will never die - but there’s a damn good reason none of the newspapers foresee a far future of paper, and that’s because their model is better delivered digitally. Why not law books?
PS - nice thread.
April 25th, 2009 at
Who’s making money from royalties on second-hand books? It ain’t the publishers, or the authors